When a Plan Collides With Reality- You Better Establish Leadership Intent
Posted on October 16th, 2009At a recent corporate Sales event, the guest speaker was retired General Rick Hillier of the Canadian Forces. I must say that he is a very engaging speaker who truly cares for the men and women that he commanded during his tenure. His condensed biography can be found at: (http://www.canadaka.net/modules.php?name=Famous_Canadians&action=viewperson&person=218)
Canadian military is an interesting place for business to learn.
- Big objectives
- Few resources
- Demanding much resourcefulness!
As General Hillier brought his soldiers on stage for us to meet and understand their stories, it was obvious to see the mutual respect and admiration and there was not a dry eye in the house and the feeling of patriotism filled the air.
What really struck me throughout his speech is how similar he was to the executives I most respect in the corporate world. General Hillier understood the value of the assets at his command and never missed an opportunity to share the spotlight with them.
Battle Plans
His view on a Battle Plan was that it was only good until you engaged the enemy and then it went out the window since the enemy hadn’t read the Battle Plan and didn’t always behave in the fashion that was expected. This sounded hauntingly familiar to the Strategic Plans put together by many organizations. Great plan that we all agree to, then we encounter the competition and our customers. Then we scramble to do mid-course corrections.
The Changing Rules of Engagement
General Hillier was explaining how the military is a hierarchical machine in that commands are passed down from the General, to the Colonel, to the Major, to the Lieutenant, and so on until the foot soldier must fulfill that command. It was this linear, directive type of order taking that caused significant casualties and injuries as soldiers followed the orders to the letter, even if they knew it was wrong.
In today’s military, according to General Hillier, they are practicing the art of “Leadership Intent”, whereby the orders still follow the same chain of command downward to the field. Yet the key difference is that the field is being asked to use their own decision-making skills and creativity- at each stage - to accomplish the desired goals. What they have discovered is that the foot soldiers are very creative and will generally accomplish what is being asked without the same number of casualties.
Similarities in the Business World
At the beginning I mentioned that General Hillier reminded me of my favorite bosses and I believe it is his strong endorsement of “Leadership Intent” that pulls at my memories. My most recent boss in the corporate world was a man a lot younger than me, but a smart savvy business man that I thoroughly respected. Each year he would lay out the challenges for us and we would determine the goals that we needed to achieve. Usually he had to pump the room full of oxygen as we always seemed to have growth targets that outpaced the industry. Once he had guided us to the desired targets, his philosophy was to get out of the way while our teams went about trying to deliver the targets. When we would hit a road block, he would step in to help us remove it by asking us enough questions to help us see the issue clearly or if it was political or required capital, he would pick up the phone and connect with his network within the company to get us back on the path again.
This is a learned skill that happens over time and as trust is built between the members of management.
What’s your style?
Will your team follow you into battle? Will they lead to success?


